the protagonists and the streets and public spaces of Bombay
Share on:

Dr. Swati Bakshi
Assistant Professor, SIMC

When Om Khandeparkar and Abhay Mehta’s Mi Hero Zhalo begins with the whooshing, hissing and  whistling of a local train in Bombay, imitated by one of its protagonists, you immediately expect  another tale of Mumbaiyya struggles involving misery and broken dreams. However, as you become  immersed in the story, which revolves around a young SilverBoy (Vishal) and a street singer (Sunil  Kumar), it becomes clear that this is not the case. In classic filmy style, Vishal left his village at the  age of 14 to become a hero in Mumbai, only to be duped by a casting director.

This left him  penniless and confused in the city until he discovered the ‘art’ of being a living statue. Ever since, he  has earned a living by painting his face and body silver and standing for hours in popular public spots  such as Bandstand Walkway or at weddings. The film’s second protagonist, Sunil Kumar, spent his  early years singing in bars along the Central Line, Mumbai’s suburban railway. As he grows older,  however, he takes his singing to the streets of Bombay, where people embrace him as a good singer,  making him feel as if “he is a hero himself”.  

With its focus on creative labour, dreaming and hustling, Mi Hero Zhalo is a complex, multi-layered  narrative. It not only reiterates the pull factors of dreams and desires projected onto the glossy  Bombay film industry, Bollywood, which attracts millions of dreamers to the city, but it also provides  a lens through which to explore the multiplicity and fragmentation of a city that enjoys the label of  ‘creative’. The strength of Mi Hero Zhalo lies in its depiction of dreaming and striving, as well as its  portrayal of vulnerability as the essence of human creativity. This becomes especially nuanced in a  world surrounded by the overconfidence generated from the manicured creativity of artificial  intelligence.

Moreover, the relationship between the protagonists and the streets and public spaces  of Bombay serves at least two main functions: a) It opens a window to the world of street  performers, allowing deeper engagement with the compulsive desire to lead a creative life in the  city, and the particularities of that life in Bombay. b) It engages with the construction of a sense of  place, focusing on the interaction between local residents as an audience and performers whom  they can see up close, touch and even slap. This, in turn, highlights the multifaceted nature of  creative cultures, the everyday practices of performance that engender unusual encounters and  intimate experiences. This presents a sense of Bombay as a fragmented space with a complex  network of local practices that coexist with and quietly negotiate with the larger film economy. 

Focusing on these micro practices provides a momentary escape from the larger, all-encompassing  macro context of Bombay as a ‘mayanagri’ of Bollywood and the constellation of relationships that  form its glamour-driven economy. By delving into the narrow alleys with their ‘heroes’, where  performative practices are negotiated in hyper-local contexts and build on histories of personal loss  and displacement, the film demonstrates how intense engagement with the visual and aural cultures  of the Bombay film industry can imbue local performers’ creative labour with meaning, fuelling  entrepreneurial energies that manifest as performative practices. 

Mi Hero Zhalo is an important social document that sheds light on the micro-history of creative  labour in everyday life in Bombay. The individual practices of its protagonists diverge from the  predominant and predictable patterns of display practised by overtly visible stars and celebrities.  Whether painted or bare, the faces of the protagonists and the props they use to create a distinct  visual and aural world offer discursive, creative and material value.