Yashaswani Chauhan, Pune
The Delhi High Court has issued fresh notices to both BBC (UK) and BBC (India) in response to a plea filed by the Gujarat-based NGO, Justice on Trial. The NGO alleges that the BBC documentary, “India: The Modi Question,” has caused significant damage to India’s reputation and contains false and defamatory claims against Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the judiciary. Presided over by Justice Sachin Datta, the bench has scheduled further proceedings for December 15.
The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that previous attempts to serve notices to both BBC entities were unsuccessful, requesting additional time for this process.
Earlier this year, the British broadcaster released a two-part documentary series focusing on the Gujarat riots that transpired during Modi’s tenure as chief minister. Following its release, the government took action to remove links to the documentary.
The NGO is seeking damages of Rs 10,000 crore on behalf of the organization, attributing the alleged harm to the reputation and goodwill of various entities, including the Hon’ble Prime Minister of India, the government of India, and the government of the state of Gujarat during the period of the Gujarat riots, as well as the people of India.
Additionally, the NGO has filed an indigent person application, indicating financial constraints in affording the court fee.
The NGO argues that the statements made by the defendant, BBC, are disparaging and defamatory, causing substantial harm to the reputation of the Prime Minister and undermining the goodwill established by him, the government of India, the government of Gujarat, and the people of India. They assert that the broadcaster’s conduct is legally actionable, making them liable for damages.
The documentary primarily revolves around the British High Commission’s investigation into the Gujarat riots, which was ordered by the then foreign affairs minister of the UK, Jack Straw. In an interview with The Wire, Straw reiterated the main findings of the report, which held Modi directly responsible for the riots.
This development underscores the ongoing legal battle surrounding the controversial documentary and its perceived implications on India’s reputation. The case remains poised for further deliberation in December, with heightened attention on the potential consequences for all parties involved.